- Mon - Sun: 24/7 online service for you

Circular No.180/12/2022-GST - (09/09/2022) - Guidelines for filing/revising TRAN-1/TRAN-2 in terms of order of Supreme Court in the case of Union of India vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd ... CLB Judgments; Contact Us. Taxguru Consultancy & Online Publication LLP - 509, Swapna Siddhi, Akurli Road, Near Railway Station, Kandivali (East), Mumbai ...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
No. 609 Argued March 3, 4, 1926 Decided April 12, 1926 271 U.S. 43 Syllabus 1. Jurisdiction of the Court of Claims to hear and decide a claim, existing under Jud.Code, § 145, was not affected by a resolution of the Senate referring to that court for consideration and report (Jud.Code, § 151) a bill for payment of the claim. P. 271 U. S. 44. 2.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
New York. According to the court, a state statute protecting employees of bakery shops from having to work more than 10 hours per day and 60 hours per week violated the "freedom of contract ...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
(1) Judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Writ Petition No. 1124 (MB) of 2001, M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher vs. 9 State of U.P. & Ors. [Giving rise to Civil Appeal (arising out of SLP No. 19445 of 2004, State of Uttaranchal & Ors. vs. State of Kumaon Stone Crusher and Civil Appeal (arising out of SLP No. 26273 of 2004, the State of U. P. & Ors. vs. M/s.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The building of the High Court is a very magnificent and was constructed in 1900 A.D. There is a park in front of the building and Naina Peak, the highest peak in Nainital, in the background, which makes the building more picturesque. In the beginning five Court rooms were constructed but later on more Court rooms have been added.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
Rather, it is relief which the court in its discretion may grant. See Osborn (SA) Ltd v United Stone Crushing Co (Pty) Ltd 1938 WLD 229; Irvin & Johnson Ltd v Oelofse Fisheries Ltd 1954 (1) SA 231(E) at 237. That the court has a discretion whether or not to grant that relief is evident from the use of the word "may" in the section.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
On 11.12.2018, after the Supreme Court remand, the NGT passed a fresh order disposing of the O.A. No. 332/2017 whereby the onus was shifted to the State Government to assess the functioning of the stone crushers and in the event, they are found violating any of the environmental norms, steps were to be taken for closure of the offending units.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
In 1861 Congress passed an act providing for the issuance of $50,000,000 in Treasury notes. Thereupon the banks, which had been actively engaged in hoarding gold, suspended specie payments on December 30 of that year. This action they took in order to avoid paying gold for Treasury notes.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the Judgment passed on 26-06-2007 by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004 (M/S), Ms. Gupta Builders v. State of Uttaranchal Para 21 of the said judgment is quoted below:- "Thus, it is clear that the forest produce provides fees and can be imposed under the MMRD Act.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
This presentation takes one through the details of recent Supreme Court Judgement in the case of Larsen & Toubro, which was a review of K Raheja Judgement. The judgement has a severe impact on the tax aspects of builders and real estate developers. It redefines the definition of works contract and levy of VAT on sale of flats and commercial ...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
Aug 18, 202118/08/2021 Rakesh Kumar Agarwal, Mahoba The National Green Authority (NGT) had imposed a fine of 6.5 crores on 6 crusher units of Kabrai, the state's largest stone market, which has been stayed by the Supreme Court. The NGT could not produce before the court the documents relating to the damage caused to the farmers' interests by the crusher units.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The Supreme Court upheld 6-1, Chief Justice Patanjali Sastri finding himself in a lonely minority. For essays in liberty and craftsmanship, the judgments of the majority deserve to form part of the must-reads for law schools, Bar education and judges at all levels. However, and not surprisingly, Justice Bose's was the sparkling one.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The issues were resolved by Supreme Court following a nonjury trial. Edward Hunt, owner of the rock-crushing facility, testified that it is located approximately 1,000 to 1,500 feet from plaintiff's property and that there is also a cement plant nearby. The rock-crushing activities are seasonal — from the spring into the fall of each year.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The Supreme Court today rejected a plea filed by a man, who was injured in the 2002 hit-and-run case involving actor Salman Khan, challenging the Bollywood star's acquittal by the Bombay High Court.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in its order of November 10, 2016 directed framing and submission of graded response action plan for various categories of National Air Quality Index (AQI).
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
United States Supreme Court. UNITED STATES v. SHARPE(1985) No. 83-529 Argued: November 27, 1984 Decided: March 20, 1985. A Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent, while patrolling a highway in an area under surveillance for suspected drug trafficking, noticed an apparently overloaded pickup truck with an attached camper traveling in tandem with a Pontiac.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
Five of the judgments between 1991 and 2001 are available while records of proceedings (ROP) are available from 2001 onwards. ... Supreme Court. ... Among others, they include water being sprinkled across the city through helicopters, stone crusher units in worst affected areas being shut, and the temporary shutting down of power generation ...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
Judgement of The Karnataka High Court dated 10.07.1998: The Honourable Chief Justice, R.P.Sethi, directed the State Government to create 'Safer Zones', giving guidelines for creating such ''safe zones', to shift all stone crushing units to these 'Safer Zones', and to submit their compliance report before 31.12.1998.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The decision of the Connecticut Supreme Court (Pet. App. 1a-34a) is reported at 333 Conn. 1. The decision of the Connecticut Superior Court (Pet. App. 35a-36a) is unreported. JURISDICTION The judgment of the Connecticut Supreme Court was entered on September 3, 2019. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1257(a).
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
Cover Story, Why Courts In India Consider Adultery As A Relic Of The Past, After much strife, the 2018 Supreme Court judgment decriminalised Section 497 of the IPC that criminalised adultery and...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
In its finer moments, the Supreme Court has ensured that constitutional rights can't be nullified openly by state officials or indirectly through evasive schemes, she continued. "Today's fractured court evinces no such courage," she wrote, instead leaving "all manner of constitutional rights more vulnerable than ever before."
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
after this Court granted interlocutory appeal on several of these decisions and entered final judgments, the Supreme Court found that a rea sonable juror could find a sufficient nexus and remanded these cases to the Superior Court for further proceedings.3 In November 2002, Wagner filed for summary judgment to
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
In 1985, environment lawyer M C Mehta filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the Union government, Haryana government, central and state pollution control boards and 65 stone crushing companies that were operating on the outskirts of Delhi. The Supreme Court slammed the Haryana government and asked it to relocate the industry.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
the court found the nra wanting on two counts: first, congress had delegated extensive law-making powers to trade organizations acting with the approval of the president; second, it had swept under federal control wholly local activities—in this instance the marketing of poultry—only remotely related to the interstate commerce which congress is .
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The judgment of five of nine Supreme Court justices is the final word on nothing. It doesn't outweigh the constitutional judgment of nearly half of their colleagues on the Court, hundreds of members of Congress, and the President. If liberals and Democrats truly believe in co-equal branches of government, they need to get comfortable saying that.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The Supreme Court heard argument regarding the In re Tam case last month regarding whether the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) could refuse to register THE SLANTS as a trademark. The Government explained that the Lanham Act prohibits the registration of any mark that may disparage persons, institutions, beliefs or national ...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
Nov 18, 2021It said that the tribunal should render its decision without being influenced by the observations made in the judgement. The top court noted that the appellant before it, along with his father, had initially moved the NGT for relocating the two stone crushers alleging unbearable sufferings due to noise and air pollution emanating from those units.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
This stone was actually delivered to Seaboard in March, 1942 In January, 1942, respondent had contracted to sell crushed stone to V. P. Loftis Co., a government contractor engaged in the construction of a government dam, for $1.50 a ton. 3 This stone was to be delivered by respondent by barge when needed at the dam site.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The US Supreme Court has quashed President Donald Trump's last-ditch effort to keep the White House by rejecting a lawsuit that sought to undo the results of the Nov 3 elections.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
IN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAHIKENG In the matter between. PLATINUM AGGREGATES (PTY) LTD and QUICK STONE CRUSHERS (PTY) LTD ALFRANCOIS HENNING CAREL ZIETSMAN ENVIRO CONSULTING Case no: M390/2020 Appellant 1st Respondent 2nd Respondent 3rd Respondent Date of hearing: Date of judgement: 4 MARCH 2022 24 MARCH 2022 Delivered
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The Supreme Court of Texas. Composed of the chief justice and eight justices, the Supreme Court of Texas is the court of last resort for civil matters in the state. The Supreme Court is in Austin, immediately northwest of the state Capitol. Supreme Court justices are elected to staggered six-year terms in statewide elections.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The Supreme Court invalidated a forest-based industry, recognizing the principle of intergenerational equity as being central to the conservation of forest resources and sustainable development. M C Mehta v. Union of India 1986. The Shriram gas leak case was a landmark judgement in the field of environmental activism.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
Nov 18, 2021The bench delivered the verdict on an appeal against the August 2019 order of the NGT. The appellant in the apex court had contended that as per an April 2014 report, the two stone crusher units...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
Credit: Hridayesh Joshi The Rajasthan government informed the Supreme Court last month that it receives Rs 5,000 crore in royalties from mining. The government does not receive any revenue from...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
They Turned Judges Into Kings Instead. In the 1980s, a lawyer named MC Mehta filed a number of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) cases in the Supreme Court of India. Unlike other cases, PILs can go on indefinitely, focusing on new concerns as they go on. Four of Mehta's PILs are still in progress today - more than 35 years later.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The Aravali Range is affected from human activities like stone crushing, cutting trees in forest area of Aravali, construction on large scale, mining, dispense and dumping waste. ... along with several environmental groups, the Supreme Court banned mining in an area of 448 square km, across Faridabad, Gurgaon and Mewat districts in Haryana ...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
GARDNER, J.S.: delivered the judgement of the court. This is an appeal against an assessment of damages by the Deputy Registrar. There being no appearance on behalf of the respondent the appeal was heard under the provisions of rule 71(b) of the Supreme Court rules.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The Aravali Range is affected from human activities like stone crushing, cutting of trees in forest area of Aravali, construction on large scale, mining, dispense and dumping of waste. ... The Supreme Court on February 20, 2010 directed cancellation of 157 mining leases operating in Rajasthan's eco-sensitive Aravaii Hills and asked the Forest ...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
The Supreme Court on Monday cancelled the bail granted by Allahabad High Court to Ashish Mishra, Lakhimpur Kheri case prime accused and a Union Minister's son, in a "tearing hurry" and without ...
WhatsApp:+8617329420102
Supreme Court, 10 February: The apex court accepted a report submitted by Environment Pollution (Prevention & Control) Authority (EPCA) on the priority measures to reduce air pollution and protect public health in the Delhi and the NCR. It targeted air pollution as an issue to be heard exclusively as a separate matter.
WhatsApp:+8617329420102